Portfolio Analysis - how judges pick winning portfolios and sports photos

Part I

1) 

    a. Travis Haughton

    b. Kids

    c. The frame was too tight, what was the point of the photo, and a little too much of little kids

    d. The point of view on the sports pictures, and in the gymnastics photo there was a lot going on.

    e. I thought that he was alright, though I agreed that he needed to zoom out a little on some of his photos. His point of views were interesting though.

    a. Nick Adams

    b. Sports

    c. Not enough story, frame too tight, focus off in 1 picture.

    d. Some pictures were close to be good, certain photo had good framing. 

    e. I thought he was pretty good, with all of his good ideas, but some of the photos I didn't get the story behind it.

    a. Jordan Murph

    b. Sports

    c. Some photos were missing something, some photos didn't fit in, 1 photo story was completely different and worse than others.

    d. Good composition, good lighting

    e. At the beginning when he showed his best, I knew immediately that his photos were just generally a lot better, but at the end he kinda killed his chances by putting too many photos and showed bad photos.

2)

    a. He is upright in there in the middle of it, everyone is doing something, and his photos are creative.

    b. I thought on some of the photos he had great point of view and that his photos were creative and different. They all had a story, and I can't see a general weakness.

3)

    a. They looked at the ones that they looked at before and considered them to maybe be the winner, then they eliminated one because they had messed up some of their photos, then they got rid of the other one because it didn't have enough diversity. So, feeling, are there bad photos, it is diverse enough?

Part II

1. 

2.